30 of 30 people found the following review helpful:
Superb, even works with the Canon 20D,
April 20, 2010 Short story: the card is superb. If you are thinking of buying it, don't hesitate.
Long story: Capacity is just shy of 30GB due to overhead. It it is v e r y fast; your camera will be the bottleneck, not this card! I tested in in 2 cameras: a newer Canon and an older Canon 20D. To my surprise, the large capacity works well with older cameras! Used with new cameras, there's nothing to know other than it is fast and works as expected. Thus, the remainder of this review will be from the standpoint of the older Canon 20D.
I had been using an 4 year old Lexar Pro 8GB 133x WA (back then, fast and high tech & costly). The performance of the 20D has actually been greatly improved using this card. To the point, I would recommend upgrading to any brand of 400x card even if you don't need the storage. There are no negative surprises but a few caveats to know for large cards in older cameras...
If you use large cards in older cameras, follow one simple...
Read more Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you?
20 of 20 people found the following review helpful:
Good price point if you need a fast 8gb CF card.,
March 9, 2010 I'm using this CF card with my Canon 40D. Previously I was using 4gb Lexar 300x cards, (equivalent to about 45mb/sec) which also work just fine, but they're only 4gb each. I found myself wanting more memory and a 3rd card to go between my two camera bodies (other is a rebel xti).
There's nothing at all wrong with this CF card, it works just perfectly. Not even a hiccup. So that's good.
I was hoping to be able to take much longer continuous sequences of photos on the 40D at 6.5 frames/sec. With the Lexar 300x cards I was able to get 15 consecutive images at full resolution raw+jpg before the camera's image buffer filled up. With this card I was disappointed to find that number only rose to 17. I later looked up the stats on the 40D and found that 17 consecutive full res images was the maximum the camera can do anyway, so I know the card is faster than the camera. If I was to get a faster card it wouldn't help me at all.
So, unless you really...
Read more Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you?
10 of 10 people found the following review helpful:
Save your money if you don't have a Canon 7D or 1D IV,
July 26, 2011 I've done some write benchmarks on the 16GB version of this card and others with my Canon 40D. Here are the results:
SanDisk Extreme 60 MB/s 16GB (400X)
17 RAW, 17 seconds to clear
SanDisk Extreme III 30 MB/s 8GB (200X)
18 RAW, 17 seconds to clear
Lexar 133X Pro 1GB
20 RAW, 16 seconds to clear
Kingston Ultimate 133X 4 GB
19 RAW, 21 seconds to clear
Kingston High Speed 1024 MB
18 RAW, 37 seconds to clear
For this circa-2008 DSLR, no card over 133X improves write speeds. No benefit was expected; cameras of this vintage max out at about 12 MB/s. All but two of the current crop of Canon and Nikon DSLRs perform at near full speed with a 200X (30 MB/s) card. These cameras reach 35 MB/s at best, so a 400X (60 MB/s) card offers only slight improvements, if any. Canon's 7D and 1D IV, both capable of 60 MB/s or more, will clear the buffer as much as twice as fast with a 400X card...
Read more Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you?
No comments:
Post a Comment